Should Dientamoeba fragillis be looked for in pediatric digestive pathology of an unknown cause? A proposed pilot case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: Dientamoeba (D.) fragilis is a common intestinal protozoan with an unresolved clinical significance. The association between D. fragilis and the etiology of gastrointestinal symptoms in children is unclear. Metronidazole is often used for treatment. The aims of this study are to clarify the clinical relevance of D. fragilis in children with gastrointestinal symptoms, and to determine the clinical and microbiological efficacy of metronidazole in D. fragilis-infected children with gastrointestinal complaints. METHODS: A prospective case-control study was performed from October 2017 to February 2019. A total of 106 individuals aged 1-17 were included. Out of the 106; 59 showed gastrointestinal symptoms (case group), and 47 were without gastrointestinal symptoms (control group). We excluded 2 patients from the case group. D. fragilis was diagnosed by real-time PCR in stool samples. A 10-day course of oral Metronidazole was prescribed in D. fragilis positive children with GI symptoms. Clinical data before and after the treatment as well as peripheral eosinophilia in previous blood samples, were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 104 participants, D. fragilis was found in 17 (29.8%) children from the case group, whereas in the control group the parasite was detected in 11 patients (23.4%) with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.39 (IC 95% 0.53-3.75, p=0.46). The most prevalent clinical manifestation was abdominal pain (46/57, 80.7%). Seventeen cases with a positive PCR received anti-parasitic treatment according to the established protocol, although during the collection period we received only 11 stool samples to perform the post-treatment follow-up. The PCR of the D. fragilis remained positive in 3 patients (3/11, 27.27%). Despite achieving the eradication of the parasite, 4/8 patients (50%) continued with digestive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: According to our study there were no differences between the D. fragilis infection in children with or without gastrointestinal symptoms. No relation was found between the clinical and microbiological responses after said D. fragilis treatment. Therefore, we conclude that it is not justified to look specifically for D fragilis in pediatric patients with abdominal symptoms.

Should Dientamoeba fragillis be looked for in pediatric digestive pathology of an unknown cause? A proposed pilot case–control study / Se debe investigar la infección por Dientamoeba fragilis en niños con enfermedad digestiva de causa desconocida? Estudio piloto caso-control

Introduction: Dientamoeba (D.) fragilis is a common intestinal protozoan with an unresolved clinical significance. The association between D. fragilis and the etiology of gastrointestinal symptoms in children is unclear. Metronidazole is often used for treatment. The aims of this study are to clarify the clinical relevance of D. fragilis in children with gastrointestinal symptoms, and to determine the clinical and microbiological efficacy of metronidazole in D. fragilis-infected children with gastrointestinal complaints. Methods: A prospective case–control study was performed from October 2017 to February 2019. A total of 106 individuals aged 1–17 were included. Out of the 106; 59 showed gastrointestinal symptoms (case group), and 47 were without gastrointestinal symptoms (control group). We excluded 2 patients from the case group. D. fragilis was diagnosed by real-time PCR in stool samples. A 10-day course of oral Metronidazole was prescribed in D. fragilis positive children with GI symptoms. Clinical data before and after the treatment as well as peripheral eosinophilia in previous blood samples, were recorded. Results: Of the 104 participants, D. fragilis was found in 17 (29.8%) children from the case group, whereas in the control group the parasite was detected in 11 patients (23.4%) with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.39 (IC 95% 0.53–3.75, p=0.46). The most prevalent clinical manifestation was abdominal pain (46/57, 80.7%). Seventeen cases with a positive PCR received anti-parasitic treatment according to the established protocol, although during the collection period we received only 11 stool samples to perform the post-treatment follow-up. The PCR of the D. fragilis remained positive in 3 patients (3/11, 27.27%). Despite achieving the eradication of the parasite, 4/8 patients (50%) continued with digestive symptoms.(AU)

Introducción: Dientamoeba (D.)fragilis es un protozoo intestinal muy común pero con una relevancia clínica incierta. El papel etiopatogénico de la D. fragilis en sintomatología gastro-intestinal no está claramente establecido. El metronidazol es con frecuencia el fármaco de elección. El objectivo de nuestro estudio fue determinar la relación entre D. fragilis y la presencia de clínica digestiva en población pediátrica así como valorar la eficacia del metronidazol en la resolución de los síntomas. Material y métodos: Estudio prospectivo caso-control realizado entre octubre 2017 y febrero 2019. Se incluyeron un total de 106 pacientes entre 1-17 años. 59 pacientes presentaban síntomas digestivos (grupo caso) y 47 pacientes asintomáticos (grupo control). Se excluyeron 2 pacientes del grupo caso. La presencia de D. fragilis se determinó por técnica de PCR real-time(PCR-RT) en muestra de heces. En los pacientes del grupo caso con PCR-RT positiva se realizó tratamiento con metronidazol durante 10 dias. Se recogieron datos clínicos antes y después del tratamiento asi como presencia de eosinofilia periférica. Resultados: De los 104 participantes, se detectó D. fragilis en el 17/59 (29,8%) en el grupo caso y en 11/47 pacientes del grupo control (23,4%) con una odds ratio (OR) de 1.39 (IC95% 0.53-3.75, p=0.46). El síntoma más frecuente fue el dolor abdominal (46/57, 80,7%). Los 17 pacientes del grupo caso recibieron metronidazol según protocolo y se realizó PCR-TR D. fragilis post-tratamiento en 11/17 pacientes. La PCR-RT persistió positiva en 3 pacientes (3/11, 27,27%). De los 8 pacientes que negativizaron PCR-RT, 4 (50%) continuaron con dolor abdominal. Conclusión: Según nuestro estudio no se encontró relación significativa entre la presencia de infección por D.fragillis y la existencia de sintomatología digestiva. Tampoco se observó mejoría clínica significativa en aquellos pacientes infectados que recibieron tratamiento.(AU)

Automated parasitological diagnosis in clinical microbiology laboratories.

Although there is a low prevalence of parasitological infections in Europe, the diagnosis of intestinal parasites is still difficult and laborious for microbiology laboratories. Currently, antigen detection assays and molecular biology allow a more accurate diagnosis, but these techniques have limitations as they cannot detect all the possible parasites present in the samples. The objective of the study was to evaluate the accuracy and the usefulness of automated microscopy SediMAX2 (77 Elektronika, Budapest, Hungary) in the detection of parasitic infections from feces. A total of 197 formol-fixed stool samples were processed in parallel by wet mount examination and by SediMAX2. Sensitivities, specificities and predictive values were analyzed, reaching a sensitivity of 89.51% and a specificity of 98.15% and a very good positive predictive value (99.22%). SediMAX2 is a good tool for a reliable diagnosis of intestinal parasitic infections. The rapid processing and the flexibilty of storage of images analyzed make its incorporation into the day to day laboratory routine recommendable.

Epidemiology of dermatophytic infections between 2008 and 2017 in Barcelona, Spain / Epidemiología de las dermatofitosis entre 2008 y 2017 en Barcelona, España

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the epidemiological profile of dermatophytoses from 2008 to 2017 in the area of "Barcelonès Nord", located in north-eastern Spain. METHODS: From 2008 to 2017, 13,419 specimens obtained from patients with suspected superficial mycosis were subjected to direct microscopy and culture. Clinical and sociodemographic data were recorded. Proportions were compared using Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. A logistic regression model was used for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Trichophyton rubrum was the most frequently isolated fungus (76.1%), followed by Trichophyton mentagrophytes/Trichophyton interdigitale (11.9%) and Microsporum canis (2.9%). Among the population over 15 years of age, tinea unguium pedum (40.4%) and tinea corporis (29.1%) were the predominant dermatophyte infections. Tinea capitis was mostly prevalent (53.6%) among patients up to 15 years of age, followed by tinea corporis (21.4%). We observed an increase in non-endemic anthropophilic dermatophytes (Trichophyton soudanense, Microsporum audouinii and Trichophyton violaceum) in the last few years. These species were associated with the population up to 15 years of age (p < 0.001), having tinea capitis (p = 0.0017) and being of African/Hindustani origin (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed the spread of T. rubrum as the predominant dermatophyte in our area and reported an increase in non-endemic anthropophilic dermatophytes in the last few years, especially in the African and Hindustani population up to 15 years of age

OBJETIVO: La finalidad del presente estudio fue evaluar el perfil epidemiológico de las dermatofitosis entre los años 2008 y 2017 en el área de «Barcelonès Nord» ubicada en el noreste de España. MÉTODOS: Entre los años 2008 y 2017, 13.419 muestras obtenidas de pacientes con sospecha de micosis superficial fueron remitidas para microscopía directa y cultivo. Se registraron datos clínicos y sociodemográficos. Las proporciones se compararon mediante las pruebas de Chi-cuadrado y Fisher. Para el análisis de variables múltiples, se utilizó un modelo de regresión logística. RESULTADOS: Trichophyton rubrum fue el hongo más frecuentemente aislado (76,1%), seguido de Trichophyton mentagrophytes/Trichophyton interdigitale (11,9%) y Microsporum canis (2,9%). Entre la población mayor de 15 años, la tinea unguium pedum (40,4%) y la tinea corporis (29,1%) fueron las dermatofitosis predominantes. La tinea capitis prevaleció principalmente (53,6%) entre los pacientes menores de 15 años, seguida de la tinea corporis (21,4%). Se percibió un aumento de los dermatofitos antropófilos no endémicos (Trichophyton soudanense, Microsporum audouinii y Trichophyton violaceum) en los últimos años. Estas especies se asociaron con la población menor de 15 años (p < 0,001), la presencia de tinea capitis (p = 0,0017) y el origen africano/indostánico (p < 0,001). CONCLUSIONES: Confirmamos el predominio de Trichophyton rubrum como el dermatofito más prevalente en nuestra área, y describimos un aumento en los dermatofitos antropófilos no endémicos en los últimos años, especialmente en población africana e indostana menor de 15 años

Diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminth infections. An unsolved problemin the omics era. / Diagnóstico de las infecciones por geohelmintos. Un problema sin resolver en la era de las ómicas.

Infections caused by Strongyloides stercoralis and other soil-transmitted worms such as hookworms (Necator americanus and Ancylostoma duodenale) represent a major problem worldwide, especially in developing areas. They are difficult to suspect clinically since they produce non-specific and often overlapping signs and symptoms. Likewise, their long prepatent periods hamper the detection of parasitic structures. Microscopic diagnosis is still the most commonly used tool in healthcare laboratories but it is still far from being the ideal technique to detect these infections due to its low sensitivity. In addition, these nematodes have strong morphologic similarities and consequently microbiological diagnosis remains a challenge. Serology has made progress in the diagnosis of S. stercoralis infection but this option is not yet available for hookworms. Molecular biology techniques have been shown to slightly increase this lack of sensitivity, but as with other parasitic infections, they are not currently available for use in clinical microbiology laboratories. Supplement information: This article is part of a supplement entitled «SEIMC External Quality Control Programme. Year 2016¼, which is sponsored by Roche, Vircell Microbiologists, Abbott Molecular and Francisco Soria Melguizo, S.A. © 2019 Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosasy Microbiología Clínica. All rights reserved.

Epidemiology of dermatophytic infections between 2008 and 2017 in Barcelona, Spain.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the epidemiological profile of dermatophytoses from 2008 to 2017 in the area of "Barcelonès Nord", located in north-eastern Spain. METHODS: From 2008 to 2017, 13,419 specimens obtained from patients with suspected superficial mycosis were subjected to direct microscopy and culture. Clinical and sociodemographic data were recorded. Proportions were compared using Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. A logistic regression model was used for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Trichophyton rubrum was the most frequently isolated fungus (76.1%), followed by Trichophyton mentagrophytes/Trichophyton interdigitale (11.9%) and Microsporum canis (2.9%). Among the population over 15 years of age, tinea unguium pedum (40.4%) and tinea corporis (29.1%) were the predominant dermatophyte infections. Tinea capitis was mostly prevalent (53.6%) among patients up to 15 years of age, followed by tinea corporis (21.4%). We observed an increase in non-endemic anthropophilic dermatophytes (Trichophyton soudanense, Microsporum audouinii and Trichophyton violaceum) in the last few years. These species were associated with the population up to 15 years of age (p<0.001), having tinea capitis (p=0.0017) and being of African/Hindustani origin (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed the spread of T. rubrum as the predominant dermatophyte in our area and reported an increase in non-endemic anthropophilic dermatophytes in the last few years, especially in the African and Hindustani population up to 15 years of age.

Diagnóstico de las infecciones por geohelmintos. Un problema sin resolver en la era de las ómicas / Diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminth infections. An unsolved problemin the omics era

Las infecciones producidas por Strongyloides stercoralis y otros geohelmintos, como las uncinarias (Necator americanus y Ancylostoma duodenale), representan un importante problema a nivel mundial, especialmente en áreas en vías de desarrollo. Clínicamente son difíciles de sospechar ya que producen cuadros inespecíficos y muchas veces solapados entre ellos. Asimismo, los largos períodos prepatentes que presentan dificultan la detección de las formas parasitarias. El diagnóstico microscópico continúa siendo la herramienta más utilizada en los laboratorios asistenciales, pero aún dista mucho de ser la herramienta ideal para detectarlos debido a su baja sensibilidad. Además, morfológicamente estos nematodos presentan similitudes importantes, por lo que el diagnóstico microbiológico aún es un reto. La serología ha permitido avanzar en cuanto al diagnóstico de la infección por S. stercoralis, pero esta opción no está disponible todavía para las uncinarias. Las técnicas de biología molecular han demostrado aumentar discretamente esta falta de sensibilidad, pero al igual que en otras infecciones parasitarias, actualmente no están disponibles para su uso en los laboratorios de microbiología clínica. Información sobre el suplemento: este artículo forma parte del suplemento titulado "Programa de Control de Calidad Externo SEIMC. Año 2016", que ha sido patrocinado por Roche, Vircell Microbiologists, Abbott Molecular y Francisco Soria Melguizo, S.A

Infections caused by Strongyloides stercoralis and other soil-transmitted worms such as hookworms (Necator americanus and Ancylostoma duodenale) represent a major problem worldwide, especially in developing areas. They are difficult to suspect clinically since they produce non-specific and often overlapping signs and symptoms. Likewise, their long prepatent periods hamper the detection of parasitic structures. Microscopic diagnosis is still the most commonly used tool in healthcare laboratories but it is still far from being the ideal technique to detect these infections due to its low sensitivity. In addition, these nematodes have strong morphologic similarities and consequently microbiological diagnosis remains a challenge. Serology has made progress in the diagnosis of S. stercoralis infection but this option is not yet available for hookworms. Molecular biology techniques have been shown to slightly increase this lack of sensitivity, but as with other parasitic infections, they are not currently available for use in clinical microbiology laboratories. Supplement information: This article is part of a supplement entitled "SEIMC External Quality Control Programme. Year 2016", which is sponsored by Roche, Vircell Microbiologists, Abbott Molecular and Francisco Soria Melguizo, S.A